# consul vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 30 094 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

If you want the quickest setup, WPS Office is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-wps-office