# consul vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 ✓ | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +21 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.

UrBackup ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

If you want the quickest setup, UrBackup is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

UrBackup is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-urbackup