# consul vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 094 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, trip2g is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-trip2g