# consul vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +11 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-transfersh