consulvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 73/100 for consul, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
consul details →TradingAgents details →