consulvsswarm-cronjob
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | swarm-cronjob | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.
consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for swarm-cronjob.
If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
consul details →swarm-cronjob details →