consulvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
consul details →supabase-automated-self-host details →