# consul vs spotify-saver

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | spotify-saver |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 ✓ | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.7.5 · 23 Nov 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 44/100 for spotify-saver, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for spotify-saver.

If you want the quickest setup, spotify-saver is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [spotify-saver](https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-spotify-saver