consulvsspeech-to-phrase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | speech-to-phrase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
consul scores 73/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.
consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
consul details →speech-to-phrase details →