# consul vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 30 090 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +20 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

rudderstack is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-rudderstack