# consul vs Print Farm Manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | Print Farm Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 ✓ | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.

If you want the quickest setup, Print Farm Manager is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [Print Farm Manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/print-farm-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/print-farm-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-print-farm-manager