consulvsPortainer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| consul | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 | 38 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +188 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 21 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Zlib |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Portainer scores 77/100 against 73/100 for consul, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.
Portainer is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).
consul details →Portainer details →