# consul vs opencut

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | opencut |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #2 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 30 090 | 96 712 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +6 091 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut scores 75/100 against 73/100 for consul, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 091 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-opencut