# consul vs OpenBrief

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | OpenBrief |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 ✓ | 580 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [OpenBrief](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-openbrief