# consul vs open·kritt

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | open·kritt |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 30 094 ✓ | 2 384 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.

If you want the quickest setup, open·kritt is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-open-kritt