# consul vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 ✓ | 9 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +60 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

consul and Octoprint score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-octoprint