# consul vs mqttui

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | mqttui |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #8 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 30 090 ✓ | 225 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.0.2 · 25 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 48/100 for mqttui, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for mqttui.

If you want the quickest setup, mqttui is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [mqttui](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-mqttui