# consul vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 30 094 ✓ | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

MikroDash ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-mikrodash