# consul vs LubeLogger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | LubeLogger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 090 ✓ | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +69 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-lubelogger