# consul vs koodo-reader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | koodo-reader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #1 of 7 in E-book Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 ✓ | 28 656 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +374 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

koodo-reader scores 78/100 against 73/100 for consul, so it is the safer default.

koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

If you want the quickest setup, koodo-reader is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

koodo-reader is growing faster right now (+374 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [koodo-reader](https://selfhost.directory/project/koodo-reader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koodo-reader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-koodo-reader