# consul vs Komga

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | Komga |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #6 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 30 088 ✓ | 6 791 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +103 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

consul and Komga score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

If you want the quickest setup, Komga is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

Komga is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [Komga](https://selfhost.directory/project/komga) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/komga.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-komga