# consul vs Kokoro FastAPI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | Kokoro FastAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 ✓ | 5 607 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +132 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-kokoro-fastapi