# consul vs ADAMANT IPFS Node

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | ADAMANT IPFS Node |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #8 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 ✓ | 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

consul is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-ipfs-node