# consul vs hls-restream-proxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | hls-restream-proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #42 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 30 089 ✓ | 255 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 46/100 for hls-restream-proxy, so it is the safer default.

consul ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hls-restream-proxy.

If you want the quickest setup, hls-restream-proxy is easier to run; consul needs more configuration.

consul is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [hls-restream-proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-hls-restream-proxy