# consul vs heplify

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | consul | heplify |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 31 in Networking | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 30 091 ✓ | 222 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.0.28 · 4 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

consul scores 73/100 against 49/100 for heplify, so it is the safer default.

heplify ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for consul.

consul is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [consul](https://selfhost.directory/project/consul) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/consul.md)
- [heplify](https://selfhost.directory/project/heplify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/heplify.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/consul-vs-heplify