# console vs HiClaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | console | HiClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 67/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 152 | 5 886 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.32 · 28 Jun 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 47/100 for console, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for console.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; console needs more configuration.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [console](https://selfhost.directory/project/console) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/console.md)
- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/console-vs-hiclaw