# Conreq vs RomM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Conreq | RomM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #105 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 151 | 14 119 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +963 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.22.1 · 25 Mar 2026 | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

RomM scores 81/100 against 44/100 for Conreq, so it is the safer default.

RomM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Conreq.

RomM is growing faster right now (+963 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Conreq](https://selfhost.directory/project/conreq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/conreq.md)
- [RomM](https://selfhost.directory/project/romm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/romm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/conreq-vs-romm