# Conreq vs Radarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Conreq | Radarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #105 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 151 | 14 670 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +246 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.22.1 · 25 Mar 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 44/100 for Conreq, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Conreq.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; Conreq needs more configuration.

Radarr is growing faster right now (+246 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Conreq](https://selfhost.directory/project/conreq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/conreq.md)
- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/conreq-vs-radarr