# Conreq vs Komga

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Conreq | Komga |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #105 of 142 in Media Management | #6 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 151 | 6 791 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.22.1 · 25 Mar 2026 | 1.29.2 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

Komga scores 73/100 against 44/100 for Conreq, so it is the safer default.

Komga ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Conreq.

Komga is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Conreq](https://selfhost.directory/project/conreq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/conreq.md)
- [Komga](https://selfhost.directory/project/komga) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/komga.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/conreq-vs-komga