# Concat vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Concat | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 12 434 | 78 720 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 435 ✓ | +2 063 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.

Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/concat-vs-unsloth