# Concat vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Concat | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 555 | 16 648 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 556 ✓ | +249 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 51 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v4.8.2 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Concat scores 82/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

Concat is growing faster right now (+2 556 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/concat-vs-trigger