# Concat vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Concat | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 510 | 114 288 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 511 | +3 540 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/concat-vs-supabase