# Concat vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Concat | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 12 498 ✓ | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 499 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Concat scores 82/100 against 71/100 for sdnext, so it is the safer default.

Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

Concat is growing faster right now (+2 499 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/concat-vs-sdnext