# Concat vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Concat | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 12 498 | 91 912 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 499 ✓ | +471 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.

Concat is growing faster right now (+2 499 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/concat-vs-paddleocr