# Concat vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Concat | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 12 421 | 92 975 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 422 | +58 034 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/concat-vs-omnivoice-studio