# Concat vs noisedash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Concat | noisedash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 3 in Audio |
| GitHub stars | 12 374 ✓ | 366 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 375 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.8.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Concat scores 82/100 against 46/100 for noisedash, so it is the safer default.

Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for noisedash.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; noisedash needs more configuration.

Concat is growing faster right now (+2 375 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)
- [noisedash](https://selfhost.directory/project/noisedash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/noisedash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/concat-vs-noisedash