# Concat vs koodo-reader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Concat | koodo-reader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 7 in E-book Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 510 | 28 664 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 511 ✓ | +372 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Concat scores 82/100 against 78/100 for koodo-reader, so it is the safer default.

koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.

If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; koodo-reader needs more configuration.

Concat is growing faster right now (+2 511 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Concat](https://selfhost.directory/project/concat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/concat.md)
- [koodo-reader](https://selfhost.directory/project/koodo-reader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koodo-reader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/concat-vs-koodo-reader