# CompreFace vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CompreFace | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 124 in AI | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 8 387 ✓ | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +110 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 69/100 for CompreFace, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, CompreFace is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

## Details

- [CompreFace](https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/compreface-vs-zabbix