# CompreFace vs Transmission

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CompreFace | Transmission |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 125 in AI | #2 of 12 in Bittorrent |
| GitHub stars | 8 388 | 15 364 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +122 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 4.1.4 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Transmission scores 76/100 against 69/100 for CompreFace, so it is the safer default.

Transmission ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CompreFace.

If you want the quickest setup, Transmission is easier to run; CompreFace needs more configuration.

Transmission is growing faster right now (+122 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CompreFace](https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface.md)
- [Transmission](https://selfhost.directory/project/transmission) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transmission.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/compreface-vs-transmission