# CompreFace vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CompreFace | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 125 in AI | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 8 387 | 29 390 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +111 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 69/100 for CompreFace, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CompreFace.

SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CompreFace](https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/compreface-vs-srs