# CompreFace vs next-image-transformation

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CompreFace | next-image-transformation |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 125 in AI | #13 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 8 388 ✓ | 638 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

CompreFace scores 70/100 against 40/100 for next-image-transformation, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, next-image-transformation is easier to run; CompreFace needs more configuration.

CompreFace is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CompreFace](https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface.md)
- [next-image-transformation](https://selfhost.directory/project/next-image-transformation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/next-image-transformation.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/compreface-vs-next-image-transformation