# CompreFace vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CompreFace | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 125 in AI | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 8 388 | 132 669 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +3 312 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1461 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 70/100 for CompreFace, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CompreFace.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CompreFace](https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/compreface.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/compreface-vs-llamacpp