# ComfyUI vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ComfyUI | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 143 752 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 015 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.43.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

ComfyUI scores 93/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

ComfyUI ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, ComfyUI is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

ComfyUI is growing faster right now (+9 015 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ComfyUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/comfyui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/comfyui.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/comfyui-vs-windows-arm