ComfyUIvsQFieldCloud
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ComfyUI | QFieldCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 143 783 | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 046 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.43.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ComfyUI scores 93/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
ComfyUI ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.
If you want the quickest setup, ComfyUI is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
ComfyUI is growing faster right now (+9 046 stars in 30 days).
ComfyUI details →QFieldCloud details →
Swap a project
Keep ComfyUI, compare it with
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with