# ComfyUI vs metamcp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ComfyUI | metamcp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 143 796 ✓ | 2 735 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 059 ✓ | +49 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.43.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ComfyUI scores 93/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

ComfyUI ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

ComfyUI is growing faster right now (+9 059 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ComfyUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/comfyui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/comfyui.md)
- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/comfyui-vs-metamcp