# collabora-online vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | collabora-online | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 6 in Office Suites | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 3 380 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | helm-collabora-online-1.3.7 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

collabora-online scores 62/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

collabora-online ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; collabora-online needs more configuration.

collabora-online is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [collabora-online](https://selfhost.directory/project/collabora-online) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/collabora-online.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/collabora-online-vs-scada-lts