collabora-onlinevsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| collabora-online | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 6 in Office Suites | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 3 380 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | helm-collabora-online-1.3.7 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |
Which one should you pick?
collabora-online scores 62/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
collabora-online ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; collabora-online needs more configuration.
collabora-online is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
collabora-online details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep collabora-online, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with