# Coder vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coder | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 17 212 | 24 044 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +552 | +784 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 67 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.35.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 76/100 for Coder, so it is the safer default.

Coder ships more often: 67 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Coder is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Coder](https://selfhost.directory/project/coder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coder.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coder-vs-temporal