# Coder vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coder | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 212 | 95 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +552 | +2 339 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 67 ✓ | 25 |
| Latest release | v2.35.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Coder, so it is the safer default.

Coder ships more often: 67 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coder](https://selfhost.directory/project/coder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coder.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coder-vs-stirling-pdf