# cobalt vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cobalt | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 45 in Download Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 45 597 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 813 ✓ | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Svelte | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

cobalt scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, cobalt is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

cobalt is growing faster right now (+1 813 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cobalt](https://selfhost.directory/project/cobalt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cobalt.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cobalt-vs-zammad